Introduction
Adults with symptomatic
diplopia often have severe functional disability. Patients with adult-onset
strabismus lack the ability to create suppression scotomas to adapt to their
deviation, thereby creating constant diplopia. The deviations may be incomitant
with diplopia only in certain gazes. The deviations may be large and exceed
normal fusional vergences. Restoring functional binocularity is critical for these
patients. Binocularity may be achieved with a variety of treatment options
including traditional ground-in prisms, Fresnel prisms, eye muscle surgery,
occlusion, or a combination of these options. Resolution of diplopia in the
primary position is usually considered the successful treatment. Secondarily,
diplopia in downgaze needs to be addressed to restore functionality for
reading. Patient expectations of treatment need to be addressed early in
diplopia management.
The most appropriate treatment
for a patient is selected with consideration of various factors including the
cause of the diplopia, severity of symptoms, overall patient health, and cost
considerations. Prisms correct strabismus by altering the pathway of light,
moving images onto the fovea of the deviated eye or within a range to allow
fusion of the images if possible. Prisms can be ground into spectacle lenses or
a Fresnel prism can be applied. In general, prisms are considered effective for
small, comitant deviations. Data is emerging for their use in larger and
incomitant deviations as well. Prisms have also been used for the relief of
symptoms in decompensated phorias and long-standing strabismus of childhood.
This article reviews the
results of prism use in adult diplopia secondary to common causes. This
includes vertical deviations secondary to fourth nerve palsy, thyroid eye
disease, skew deviation, and blowout fracture as well as horizontal deviations
secondary to sixth nerve palsy, decompensated phoria, divergence insufficiency,
and convergence insufficiency.
Fresnel Prisms
The Fresnel principle states that prismatic or
refractive power can be achieved by employing a concentric set of prismatic
rings with the face of each ring having the prismatic power or curvature of the
lens element it replaces, respectively. Fresnel prisms are 1.0 mm in thickness
regardless of the power of their prismatic correction. The thinner prism allows
a wider range of prismatic corrections to be used in spectacles. Once the
Fresnel prism was modified with optical-grade polyvinyl chloride, allowing the
application of the prism directly to spectacle lenses, their use became more
widespread. In most cases, the
cost of Fresnel prisms is much lower than ground-in prisms. Fresnel prisms are
particularly effective in temporary situations, such as sixth and fourth nerve
palsies from microvascular insults when resolution of the diplopia is expected.
They are also useful when deviations vary between near and distance. Fresnel
prisms can be applied to only the top or bottom of a spectacle lens, allowing
for positional variability in the deviation to be addressed. When the exact
prismatic correction needed is unknown, the cost advantage also favors Fresnel
prisms. Fresnel prism can be used in cases of larger deviations, as an initial
trial prior to permanent prism spectacles, large lateral incomitance, and when
uncertainty exists in a patient's subjective response to prism.
Fresnel prisms have some disadvantages. The
degradation of visual acuity in the distance is more with Fresnel lenses of
greater than 12 prism diopters compared with traditional ground-in prisms. There are also increased optical aberrations,
loss of contrast and light scatter in larger Fresnel prisms. In addition, the
grooves of the Fresnel are cosmetically visible. Further optical degradation
occurs when dust and other small particles accumulate within the grooves of the
Fresnel prism. Inadequate application of the Fresnel prism allows trapped air
pockets between the Fresnel membrane and the spectacle lens, further degrading
visual acuity. Twenty percentage of patients in one study discontinued Fresnel
prism usage because of these side effects. In another study, only 8% continued in Fresnel prism once
satisfactory treatment of the diplopia was achieved. The balance of these disadvantages against the
advantages has led to the frequent use of Fresnel prisms to correct diplopia.
Because of the limitations, the Fresnel should
only be applied to one eye. Typically, the nondominant eye is chosen for the
application of the Fresnel because of the effect on visual acuity. Horizontal
and vertical prism can be achieved through the oblique application of an
appropriate prism onto the spectacles. In cases of reduced visual acuity in one eye, for example, from
macular disease or optic neuropathy, the Fresnel can be effectively used to
eliminate diplopia. The resulting further
reduction in visual acuity is well tolerated.
Vertical
Deviations
There are many causes for
vertical diplopia. Prism use in fourth nerve palsy, skew deviations,
decompensated childhood strabismus, thyroid eye disease, and blowout fractions
will be covered in this section.
Fourth Nerve Palsies
Vertical deviations are often
more disabling in adults because of low vertical fusional amplitudes. Although
the typical prism prescribed for horizontal deviations is generally 50% of the
total deviation, a greater percentage of the total deviation is needed for
vertical strabismus. Incomitance in fourth nerve palsies is particularly
difficult to address with prisms. In fact, some studies have suggested that
prism should not be attempted in patients with fourth nerve palsy because of
the incomitance. A recent review
of fourth nerve palsies showed good outcomes with prism. In this study, adults with acquired
fourth nerve palsy had an average vertical deviation in primary position of 5.5
prism diopters. Most patients did not have an accompanying horizontal
deviation. These patients required the full 5.5 prism diopters of correction to
relieve the diplopia, consistent with poor vertical fusional amplitudes. In the
same review, patients with symptomatic congenital fourth nerve palsies had
larger deviations in primary with a mean deviation of 8.3 prism diopters. These
patients required a mean prismatic correction of 6 prism diopters or 73% of
their total deviation. In another review of patients with both congenital and
acquired fourth nerve palsies, the mean deviation in primary was 7.7 prism
diopters and a mean correction of 6 prism diopters in Fresnel prism was
prescribed.
Successful use of prism was
subjectively reported by Tamhankar et al. as
completely satisfied, mostly satisfied (with some residual diplopia or
asthenopia), or unsatisfactory because of persistent diplopia. In this
retrospective review, all patients included in the study were treated with
prism, probably resulting in a physician bias of patient selection. Prism would only be prescribed if the
physician felt the patient was likely to be satisfied. Nevertheless, with these
criteria for success, 75% of patients with congenital fourth nerve palsy were
completely satisfied and 92% were completely or mostly satisfied. In patients
with acquired fourth nerve palsy, 78% were completely satisfied with prism
correction and 86% were completely or mostly satisfied. In the Fresnel study, 50% of patients
continued with Fresnel prism correction permanently. High success rates may result from
adequate management of patient expectations. In addition, patients with
congenital fourth nerve palsies have high vertical fusional amplitudes,
allowing for better fusion in gazes in which the deviation is not fully
corrected with prisms.
Skew and Decompensated Childhood
Strabismus
A similar study of patients
with skew deviation found that prism correction for on average 92% of the total
vertical deviation in primary position resulted in 100% satisfaction with prism
treatment in a small group of patients. The
mean vertical deviation in primary position was small (5.5 prism diopters), and
the total mean correction was essentially the total deviation (6.1 prism
diopters). In patients with decompensated strabismus, the mean vertical
deviation was even smaller (4.0 prism diopters) with full prismatic correction
given. Patients with
decompensated strabismus also had horizontal deviations, and oblique prism was
attempted. Possibly because of the combination of vertical and horizontal
prism, these patients reported a lower prism satisfaction rate of 85%.
In
another study of patients with vertical diplopia from long-term disruption of
fusion, most patients had a combination of horizontal and vertical deviations. Horizontal deviations were managed
with exercises to increase horizontal fusional vergences. Vertical deviations
were treated with prism. Successful resolution of diplopia was reported in
three of the five patients in this report.
Thyroid Eye Disease
Patients with thyroid eye
disease-related strabismus also often have incomitant deviations because of
greater disease involvement of the inferior and medial rectus muscles. The
average prismatic correction for thyroid eye disease patients was 9.2 prism
diopters, with 72% of cases needing vertical prism. Fresnel prism adequately
corrected the diplopia in primary position for all but one patient, although the
satisfaction with prism was reduced in this incomitant condition with only 55%
of patients reporting complete satisfaction.
Patients with thyroid eye
disease following inferior rectus recession may also present with diplopia
limited to downgaze. Options to correct this situation include Fresnel prism in
the bifocal segment, separate reading glasses with prism, ground-in prism in
the bifocal segment by slab-off, unequal bifocal heights with induced prism, or
occlusion of the bifocal segment for the nondominant eye. Fresnel prism in the
bifocal segment is often not tolerated in these patients because of image blur. In Kushner's study, only 11% of
patients were satisfied with this treatment. Ground-in prism in the bifocal
segment using slab-off or reverse slab-off technique was also poorly tolerated
because of the increasing deviation in progressive downgaze (17% success). The most successful treatment for this
condition was raising the bifocal segment in the spectacles and switching
progressive-type bifocals for classical bifocal segments.
Blowout Fractures
Patients with diplopia
associated with blowout fractures have the additional treatment option of
orbital fracture repair. Diplopia may occur from entrapment of the muscle,
muscle or soft-tissue edema, muscle fibrosis, or associated cranial nerve
palsies. In cases of entrapment of the inferior or medial rectus muscle,
release of the muscle and fracture repair should be instituted usually within
48 h of the injury. The reported incidence of diplopia following blowout
fractures varies from 57 to 86%. In
a review of diplopic cases, 63–74% of patients had elimination of the diplopia
with orbital fracture repair. In another study, diplopia was eliminated in 89%
of patients with orbital fracture repair alone. Alternatively, strabismus
surgery can be delayed from the time of injury by several months to allow
improvements in periorbital tissue and extraocular muscle edema and hemorrhage.
In patients undergoing inferior
rectus recessions for diplopia from orbital floor fracture, postoperative
persistent diplopia in downgaze may occur if the involved inferior rectus
muscle is partially paralyzed or suffers a flap tear from the orbital fracture.
This results in a hypertropia of the involved eye in downgaze. The treatment
options then become the same as for thyroid patients with the similar complaint
of diplopia in downgaze only.
Horizontal
Deviations
There are a vast number of
causes for horizontal diplopia. The results of prism in sixth nerve palsy,
divergence insufficiency, decompensated childhood strabismus, and convergence
insufficiency are reviewed in this section.
Sixth Nerve Palsies
In patients with horizontal
deviations, such as sixth nerve palsies, fusional divergence can be utilized to
allow for smaller prismatic correction to re-establish binocularity, but the
lateral incomitance can be disabling. In one study, the average deviation in a
group of patients with sixth nerve palsy was 13 prism diopters at distance. The average prismatic correction was 9
prism diopters. The success rate with prismatic treatment in patients was not
reported for this cohort specifically, but on average was 80% of all patients
with diplopia from several causes in the study. Four of 22 patients (18%) with partial
recovery of their sixth nerve palsy had elimination of their diplopia with
prisms in one study.
Left Sixth ( Abducent) Nerve Palsy
Divergence Insufficiency
Another group of patients with
horizontal deviations are patients with divergence insufficiency. This group
has an esotropia greater in the distance than at near. The mean deviation was
9.8 prism diopters for this group in one study. The average prismatic correction was
7.7 prism diopters. The success rate of prism was 100% in the 30 patients
reported in the study. Other studies have suggested vergence exercises or eye muscle surgery to treat these patients.
Decompensated Childhood
Strabismus
( Comparative Study)
Patients with diplopia from
decompensated childhood strabismus may also be managed with prisms. Seventy-four
percent of adult patients with strabismus have horizontal deviations, seventeen
have vertical deviations, and combined horizontal and vertical deviations occur
in 9%. The mean horizontal
deviation in a group of adults with decompensated strabismus was 18 prism
diopters of exotropia and 15 prism diopters of esotropia. The mean correction prescribed in
prism was 11 prism diopters and 8 prism diopters, respectively. Prism
successfully resolved diplopia in the primary position in 71% of this group of
patients with decompensated esotropia and exotropia combined. All but one of the patients in this
group had greater than 10 prism diopters prescribed. The satisfaction rate did
not differ significantly between patients who had esotropia compared to exotropia.
Patients requiring both horizontal and vertical prism (i.e. oblique prism) had
the least satisfaction, 57%.
Convergence Insufficiency
Prism correction for
convergence insufficiency presents several unique problems. In convergence
insufficiency, diplopia occurs because of an exodeviation at near greater than
in the distance or with no distance deviation. In Tamhankar et al.'s study, the mean deviation for patients with
convergence insufficiency was 12 prism diopters, with 8 prism diopters
prescribed in prismatic correction. Only 50% of patients had complete
resolution of diplopia with prismatic correction. The authors speculated that
need for prism only at near makes the prism harder to use for these patients.
In children, base-in prism also did not prove successful in the treatment of
convergence insufficiency. Convergence
exercises have been successful in the treatment of convergence insufficiency. One study randomized presbyopic
patients with convergence insufficiency to glasses with base-in prism correction
or presbyopic correction alone. This study revealed a greater improvement in
convergence insufficiency survey scores in patients with prism.
Successful use of prism requires correction of the entire deviation in
cases of vertical deviations such as acquired fourth nerve palsy in order to
achieve satisfaction for patients. Prism is least likely to successfully
control symptoms in convergence insufficiency. Realistic patient expectations
of prism usage, frequent follow-up of patients to ensure control of symptoms,
and modification of prism improve patient satisfaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment